-
Unikation by Rody R Klein
When I was a child, my father often told me something that deeply marked my life:
“What matters is not what you mean. What matters is what you say.”
For many people, this may sound obvious. For me, it never was.
I am on the autism spectrum, and from a very early age I became fascinated, and sometimes disturbed, by the strange gap that can exist between what one individual tries to express and what another individual actually understands.
This question progressively shaped both my inner journey and my travels around the world including China as a landmark of complexity. It also shaped my academic and experimental research.
Over time, I began to feel that most communication technologies are not really designed to help two individuals understand each other more deeply. They mainly optimize the circulation of information.
But information and meaning are not the same thing as you most probably noticed.
Two individuals can use the same words while inhabiting completely different interpretive worlds.
This is where the idea of Unikation emerged.
Unikation explores the possibility of creating reflective semantic environments capable of assisting the dynamic alignment of meaning between two individuals.
The project is based on the idea that each person progressively develops what we call a “Unikational Sphere”: a living constellation of memories, emotions, cultural references, symbolic associations, linguistic habits, personal experiences and interpretive tendencies through which meaning is perceived and constructed.
These spheres are not fixed profiles. They evolve through interaction.
The role of the machine is not to replace human interpretation. The role of the machine is to help mediate, reveal, clarify and sometimes “translate” differences in interpretation between two human beings.
In this perspective, AI becomes less a generator of content than a mediator of meaning.
Unikation is currently evolving both as a conceptual research project and as an emerging Deep Semantic AI framework.
Several proof-of-concept and prototyping directions are already progressing relatively quickly in applied and industrial niches involving communication reliability, training environments and semantic mediation between individuals.
At the same time, many of the most open and unexplored dimensions of the project may exist in artistic, literary, video and narrative environments.
Because art does not simply transmit information. Art constructs interpretive worlds.
An artist, filmmaker or writer often develops a singular “semantic” universe through their own unikational sphere.
The question then becomes:
How could AI-mediated semantic systems help create hybrid bridges between:
● the creator,
● the machine,
● and the interpretive sphere of each individual member of the audience?
Not in order to standardize interpretation, but to allow richer and more adaptive circulations of meaning.
In such a perspective, the machine would not replace the artwork. It would function more like a semantic passport or interpretive bridge.
The same film, text, visual work or narrative experience could potentially resonate differently according to the interpretive architecture of each viewer, reader or participant. But toward the same meaning with different words.
This is also why experimental artistic communities such as Very Private Gallery may represent particularly fertile environments for these explorations.
Because ambiguity, interpretation, resonance and semantic divergence are not considered communication failures there.
They are part of the material of art itself.
Perhaps the future of AI will not only concern intelligence in the computational sense.
Perhaps part of its future also lies in the emergence of new infrastructures for the circulation of meaning between individuals. Acknowledging for each of us, a unique language.
-
0 Replies
Sorry, there were no replies found.
Log in to reply.